My Anthem

Monday, October 01, 2007

Reject Najib's three-man panel now!

Sdr KIM QUEK gives an UPDATE on an issue which will not go away just because the Government has appointed a Three-Man Panel -- many of us believe the panel with a very limited "scope" of operation just to verify te "authenticity of the video tape" is merely an "eyewash". Further, two out of the three members' credentials are not what one would say of "impeccable character" as ascribed by Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak when announcing the appointments.

01.10.2007

No sooner had the spirit of the nation been elated by the historical “Walk for Justice” held in Putrajaya on Sept 26 than it was doused by the Malaysian Bar President’s hasty acceptance (on the same day) of the three-man “independent” panel hurriedly announced by Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak on the previous day Sept 25.

Najib’s so called independent panel is a ploy designed to deflect the real target of cleansing our corrupt judiciary, which has been crippled by dictates of the executive.

By accepting the panel, the Bar has placed its own request for a royal commission of enquiry in abeyance, weakened the positions of other petitioners to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for the same commission of enquiry, and dampened the fervour for change that has rapidly gathered momentum across a wide spectrum society since the exposure of the Lingam video clip by Anwar Ibrahim on Sept 19.

Najib’s panel is a complete nonsense, for it not only misses the forest for the tree in its scope, it is also totally inadequate in respect of moral authority, legal power and impartiality of panelists. Let me elaborate.

SCOPE OF ENQUIRY

The panel’s term of reference is limited to ascertaining the authenticity of the video clip. But the nation is more interested in the hanky-panky that is going on between the prime minister and top judges as indicated in the Lingam – Fairuz telephone conversation. Lingam has given us a lead as to how judicial appointments and promotions (especially in top positions) are made based on personal loyalty to the political and financial interests of the prime minister as brokered by business and political cronies. We want to know the extent of political control exerted on the judges and how it has caused miscarriages of justice in the past. Only by finding out the truth can we rectify the wrong.

Authenticity is of course a pre-requisite to any enquiry, but in this case, it is almost a foregone conclusion as both Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz and lawyer V K Lingam have not openly denied such serious allegations two weeks after the video’s exposure .

Is it conceivable that in this day of instant communication and revolutionary technology that the government, having access to the video for two weeks just like the rest of the world, is so ignorant of the authenticity of the tape, that it has to appoint an “independent” panel to ascertain it while refusing to consider anything else? What conclusion can we draw other than it is a government tactic to diffuse public pressure and to buy time to wiggle its way out of this damning scandal?

MORAL AUTHORITY

This panel is appointed by the Deputy Prime Minister and presumably reporting to the same. But don’t forget that this video is about the prime minister manipulating the judiciary for personal and political gains – a serious breach of the Constitution by the head of the Executive, and by extension, the ruling party who stands to gain politically in this illicit relationship. So wouldn’t there by a conflict of interests if the deputy head of the Executive were to appoint a panel responsible to him to uncover the sins committed by the Executive? How would an administrative panel under the jurisdiction of the deputy prime minister be able to command the kind of moral authority required of it?

LEGAL POWER

This Najib panel is only an administrative body without the legal power to summon witnesses and compel evidences. It cannot even directly interview those implicated to obtain details from them. So its findings have to be based on those from the police, Anti-Corruption Agency and other government bodies.

So we do not expect the panel’s conclusion to differ from those of the police or ACA, and we don’t see how call such investigations “independent”.

IMPARTIALITY OF PANELISTS

The leader of the panel is Haider Mohd Noor, (correction on speling by Desi: Haidar)a former chief judge of Malaya , now chairman of Bumiputra-Commerce Bank Bhd, which is controlled by DPM Najib’s brother Nasir. Haidar is also a trustee of Perdana Leadership Foundation, which is used by former premier Mahathir as his base to continue his political activities after he stepped down as premier. And as then prime minister, Mahathir is seen as the ultimate manipulator of the judiciary when the Lingam video was recorded in early 2002, and as such Mahathir should eventually be the prime target of investigation in the present scandal.

With these connections to the interested parties, Haider is already ill-suited to participate in this panel. However, Haidar’s worst problem comes from his dubious role in the infamous judicial crisis in 1998, when Mahathir unjustly sacked then Lord President Salleh Abas and two other Supreme Court judges, resulting in the subjugation of the institution of judiciary to executive control until this very day. Haidar, as Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court then, ordered the court seal and doors to the Supreme Court be locked, in defiance of Supreme Court Judge Wan Suleiman’s request, so as to prevent an emergency court hearing, which would otherwise have issued an injunction to stop the Tribunal that led to Salleh’s dismissal.

Panelist Lee Lam Thye is chairman of the National Service Council and reports directly to Najib who is also Minister of Defence. Lee is also a director of Media Prima Bhd which is UMNO’s media flagship that controls its vast media empire of newspapers, TV, radios, etc. It is mainly through Media Prima that UMNO exercises its stranglehold on information dissemination that has kept vast sections of the populace in the darkness with regards to the real crises confronting the nation precipitated by UMNO’s serious misrule. And UMNO, as the real political power controlling the country, is of course the beneficiary of the unholy politician-judiciary nexus, and therefore a hugely interested party in the present investigation of the Lingam video clip.

In addition to these questionable links to the interested parties, Lee is suffering from an image problem arising from his sudden and mysterious resignation as No.2 leader in DAP that caused a party crisis on the eve of 1990 election. Many continue to hold Lee in suspicion, citing his move against his party in 1990 as part of a plot that enabled then Prime Minister Mahathir to call a snap election at the enemy’s weakest moment. And of course, Lee’s subsequent elevation in social status (a Tan Sri now) and wealth (directorship of many companies), much of which through goodwill of the ruling power, does not help to shed his image as some one deeply beholden to the ruling party.

An important purpose of the enquiry is to restore confidence to the judiciary in particular and the government in general, whose image has been much tattered by a series of grave scandals in recent days. The appointment of a panel with such questionable backgrounds can only deepen the people’s mistrust of the entire establishment.

ROYAL COMMISSION

It will be seen that all the above weaknesses can be overcome, if the Yang di-Pertuan Agong exercises his power under the Commissions of Enquiry Act 1950 to appoint a royal commission of reputable individuals to probe the video clip. This commission, which will be vested with legal power to summon witnesses, compel evidences and provide protection to witnesses, will ascertain the extent of decadence of our judiciary and recommend appropriate remedies. The report will be submitted to the Agong for deliberation by Parliament.

There is of course no guarantee that a good royal commission report will lead to the salvation of the judiciary, as shown in the case of Royal Commission Report on the Police completed several years ago. Though the report on police is excellent, but our police force continues to deteriorate as reflected by continuing scandals and mounting crime rates, despite huge fortunes being spent in upgrading facilities and increasing manpower. This is due to the lack of political will to eradicate the root causes of rampant corruption and wanton human right abuses.

Nevertheless, a royal commission is an important first step, as effective exposure by a dedicated commission will open the eyes of the people to the gravity of our weaknesses, thereby giving impetus to the mass movement that will compel the hands of the government to initiate the necessary changes.

Allowing the status quo to continue is not an option, as a deteriorating judicial system will hasten the slide in investors’ confidence that was set in since the Asian financial crisis a decade ago. The consequential damage to our economy and national well being will only accelerate under the intensifying pressure of globalization. These mounting economic challenges in an ambience of worsening racial and religious tensions as has been taking place now under UMNO’s leadership will surely drive this nation towards disintegration.

It is therefore vital that all Malaysians treat the present judicial crisis as reflected by the Lingam video clip as a life-or-death issue that must be tackled with full force until it is resolved. In this respect, it is heartening to see that Parti Keadilan Rakyat already submitted its petition to the Agong for a royal commission on Sept 28, and there are indications that other bodies will follow suit. This is the time when the people must unequivocally exert their collective will to make this commission a reality.

Finally, it is hoped that the Malaysian Bar would urgently review its position with regards to Najib’s panel, and once again take the lead role, as natural guardians of law should, in a renewed charge towards thorough cleansing of our judiciary. And that means Najib’s panel must be rejected forthwith.

Kim Quek




Desiderata: The highlights (thus BOLDED) are all Desi's. My EsteemedReaders are invited to address their views, even dissenting ones, to Sdr Kim who will now feature quite regularly as GUEST BLOGGER at Desi's Place. It helps to fill the vacuum when the hoRst goes galloping during a mispronounced HI-atus!

2 comments:

Manap bin Monep said...

It's utterly OBSCENE when somebody like Bush - who launched a succession of "pre-emptive strikes" against sovereign nations, leaving a trail of death and destruction, and who doesn't doesn't give a hoot how most Americans feel about waging perpetual war - has the gall to speak out on behalf of democracy and human rights in Burma. I get exactly the same feeling of disgust when I see Najib Razak shaking hands all over the country, pretending it's business-as-usual, when EVERYBODY WANTS TO SEE HIM SUBPOENAED TO TESTIFY AT THE ALTANTUYA TRIAL (because there is absolutely no way he can convince anybody that he isn't a key player in the corrupt and murderous game involving billion-euro arms deals).
Not only that, the bloody idiot waved a keris and called for Chinese blood at an Umno rally just before Operation Lallang in 1987; and he put his big foot in his big mouth again recently by declaring (contrary to the Constitution) that Malaysia is an Islamic state. Such a man can only be described as thoroughly DISREPUTABLE and unfit to hold public office. Indeed, I would like to see him exiled to Fernando Poo for his appalling greed as defence minister and his disgraceful lack of integrity. And THIS dishonorable man has the effrontery to appoint an "independent" panel to investigate the Lingam video (note, the video is the problem, NOT the Judiciary!) Podah!

desiderata said...

manap: I believe this is thy maiden Visit hear? Raise two cuppa tehtarik to thee!

AP(non-RM20k-generating-kind) for late reply; went into HI-atus for a w'ile
Thy feelings about DPM are quite common among our Rakayt
But these leaders are either sleepy like their CEO
or in compleat denial
Let's VOte wisely
VOte OPposition:) for
V: Victory Veni, Vidi,Vici!
V: Vindiaction
V: