May God have mercy on them/damned!
I:
S:
A: men.
YL, Desi
From The Malaysian Insider -- they don't charge me, neitrher do I get a check from them:) or :(
Related Articles
Sodomy II: PKR man to lodge report against Utusan
KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 4 — PKR communications director Jonson Chong will be filing a police report today against national newspaper, Utusan Malaysia allegedly for publishing “false news” on Sodomy II.
“I’m going to lodge a report against Utusan for publishing false news,” Chong, a lawyer by training, told reporters at the court complex here this evening.
He was rushing to the Tropicana police station in Merchant Square, Petaling Jaya, just two doors away from the political party’s headquarters.
A dissatisfied Chong said the Malay-language daily’s act was tantamount to contempt of court, despite the High Court’s earlier refusal to cite Utusan for the offence.
“The judge said: ‘If you want to take this up, go lodge a police report’,” Chong claimed.
“So we take it up to prove their intent was malicious,” he added.
PKR adviser, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, 62, is on trial for allegedly sodomising his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, 24, at an upscale condominium in Damansara Heights two years ago.
His lawyers had earlier made a bid to cite Utusan Malaysia for contempt for publishing a news article that is said to contain material that the trial judge, Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah, had ordered expunged from the court records yesterday.
Anwar, who spoke to reporters at the courthouse steps on his way out, lashed out at the influential Umno-owned newspaper for publishing the news.
“In this case, if there is already a charge, let me face a fair judicial system,” a grim-looking Anwar said, “but no.”
“Yesterday’s statement, we have checked our records, the prosecution’s and the court’s, there were no statements as mentioned on the front page of Utusan, meaning Utusan is a tool of Umno.
“They want to fight me in front, cannot, so they make a dirty, rude and disgusting false accusation,” the ex-deputy prime minister formerly from Umno railed.
DESIDERATA: If any of my R has a copy (Online:) of the said Utusan Malaysia report Johnson Chong refers to as "offending", please forward it to my email addie: chongyl2000@yahoo.com. Thanks a million minus wan -- Utusan!
************************************** UPDATEd 8.29AM Feb 5, 2009, from RPK's malaysia-today.net:
ow, yet again, they are trying to fabricate evidence against Anwar
Thursday, 04 February 2010 Super Admin
The ‘evidence’ is ready. The semen specimen on Saiful’s underwear has been 'confirmed' as Anwar’s. The only problem is if they allow an independent foreign expert to do an audit on the Chemistry Department’s findings, he or she might confirm that the specimen is ten years old and not dated 26 June 2008 as alleged.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
It was a great party that night. The Chemistry Department was so pleased they had an airtight case against Anwar Ibrahim they decided to celebrate. And the RM25,000 party was financed by a Good Samaritan who was delighted that this time, unlike last time, they have got Anwar by the balls.
RM25,000 is not a lot to spend on a party if it is a party to celebrate the wedding of the Prime Minister. Last year, when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi got married to the Maid from Putrajaya, they spent millions. RM25,000 is also not a lot to spend on a celebration the day Najib Tun Razak finally takes over as Prime Minister in 2010. Rosmah Mansor spends more than that on a handbag. But RM25,000 is certainly a lot to spend on a party to celebrate the ‘success’ of the Chemistry Department in being able to nail Anwar’s balls to the wall.
Why does the Good Samaritan need to sponsor a RM25,000 party for the Chemistry Department staff? What is there to celebrate? Do they always celebrate with a RM25,000 party whenever they succeed in cracking a case? Or was this a once-in-a-lifetime celebration for successfully coming up with the ‘evidence’ to send Anwar to jail for at least ten years, which will ensure he will never be able to form the new federal government on 16 September 2008?
Hold on awhile though. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that Anwar must volunteer his ‘new’ DNA profile. The 1998 DNA profile that the police have on record is ‘too old’, argued Abdullah. The police, in turn, said that if Anwar refuses to volunteer his ‘new’ DNA profile then they would have to obtain a court order to force him to do so. Hmm…..there appears to be many things wrong with all this.
Firstly, if the Chemistry Department has already wrapped up its case and the airtight ‘evidence’ against Anwar has already been secured then why the need for Anwar’s new DNA profile? DNA profiles never expire. Would the police also need Anwar’s ‘new’ fingerprints because the one they took ten years ago has ‘expired’? Fingerprints never change from the day you were born till the day you die. And the same goes for DNA profiles as well.
If you can remember, they once dug up Napoleon Bonaparte’s grave and did an examination to prove he had died of arsenic poisoning. And Napoleon died on 5 May 1821, which is more than 187 years ago. You mean to say that Anwar’s DNA profile of ten years ago is already basi?
The truth is, the airtight ‘evidence’ that the Chemistry Department recently conjured is based on Anwar’s specimen of 1998. So they need a new specimen dated 2008. If not, if Anwar calls in an independent foreign expert to audit the Chemistry Department’s evidence, he or she might just discover that the so-called ‘evidence’ is actually ten years old and not from the 26 June 2008 ‘sodomy’ incident as alleged by the government.
Yes, that’s right, they not only can tell whether the so-called ‘semen’ on Saiful’s underwear belongs to Anwar, they can also tell whether it is from September 1998 when they first took Anwar’s specimen, or whether it is dated 26 June 2008 as alleged by the government.
The ‘evidence’ is ready. The semen specimen on Saiful’s underwear has been 'confirmed' as Anwar's. The only problem is if they allow an independent foreign expert to do an audit on the Chemistry Department’s findings, he or she might confirm that the specimen is ten years old and not dated 26 June 2008 as alleged.
So they need to exchange the September 1998 specimen with a new one dated July 2008. And that is why Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Syed Hamid Albar, and all those others, have asked Anwar to volunteer his new specimen. They need this new specimen to ‘prove’ that the semen on Saiful’s underwear is dated 26 June 2008 and not September 1998. And Abdullah himself ‘confirmed’ this when he asked Anwar to volunteer his new specimen whereas the old specimen is good enough if it is just required for DNA profiling -- only that it would not pass the test if an independent foreign expert was to audit the Chemistry Department’s ‘evidence’ and then come out with a report that says the specimen is ten years old.
Yes, in September 1998 they already took Anwar’s specimen. But they can’t use it as evidence in this latest sodomy allegation. They need to ‘update’ the evidence and unless they can force Anwar to give them his new specimen then the evidence will be shot full of holes. And that is why the police had to reluctantly release Anwar on police bail one day after his dramatic Hollywood-style arrest. They had to either release him or bring him to court to be charged. But how to charge Anwar when the evidence is defective? And evidence of Anwar’s so-called sodomy crime supported by a specimen from September 1998 will certainly be defective and will not stand up in court. Anwar is alleged to have sodomised Saiful on 26 June 2008, not in September 1998.
Now can you see how the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP work? And these two slithery creatures are the same slime-balls and scumbags who fabricated evidence in 1998 that resulted in Anwar having to spend six years in jail. And am I committing an act of sedition and criminal defamation in saying this? I certainly hope so. And, while we are at it, why not I commit yet another ‘crime’? I am going to accuse the AG and IGP of fabricating evidence and of intimidating witnesses.
You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.
Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.
The ‘evidence’ against Anwar is no good. They now need to look for another way to ‘prove’ that Anwar sodomised Saiful. In the meantime, let us see if the AG will be making another police report against me and whether the IGP is going to arrest me and charge me in court for sedition and criminal defamation for this latest allegation of mine.
Hey, I already face four charges of sedition and criminal defamation. What are another two or three charges? The important thing is not whether I get sent to jail or not. What is important is that the world is told that they are attempting, yet again, to fabricate evidence against Anwar Ibrahim. And that is worth going to jail for.
THE ABOVE ARTICLE WAS FIRST PUBLISHED ON 21 JULY 2008. SOON AFTER THAT I WAS SUMMONED TO BUKIT AMAN BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO 'TAKE MY STATEMENT' ON A CHARGE OF SEDITION. I REFUSED TO GIVE MY STATEMENT AND THE POLICE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO RELEASE ME. THEY THEN RAIDED MY HOUSE TO LOOK FOR THE DOCTOR'S REPORT AND CONFISCATED VARIOUS DOCUMENTS. THEY COULD NOT FIND MY COMPUTER THOUGH ALTHOUGH THEY SEARCHED THE ENTIRE HOUSE. LESS THAN TWO MONTHS LATER I WAS DETAINED UNDER THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT.
************************* UPDATEd @1.16PM, because Desi maketh it convenient for his ER; care to by me tehtari"? Badder yet, throw in Furong's bestA kambing at Lingam's, jest don't bring the CJ along! ~~ YL, Desi
From The MI:
Ku Li says Sodomy II challenges confidence in government
KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 4 — Gua Musang MP Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah (picture) said parts of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s ongoing sodomy trial is posing a serious challenge to public confidence in the government as it was being held in a politicised environment with unbalanced pre-trial publicity.
In a statement today, the Kelantan prince noted that “public confidence is essential to the basic functioning of government” amid speculation that Anwar is facing the sodomy charge due to his coalition pact’s historic sweep of four states and 82 parliamentary seats in Election 2008.
He noted that the trial was being conducted in an overwhelmingly politicised environment, adding “part of its context is the earlier trial of Anwar on the same charge, a trial which was perceived worldwide as politically motivated”.
“We do not longer live in an insulated world,” said the veteran Umno leader popularly known as Ku Li.
He also said pre-trial publicity by the local mainstream media has been “so blatantly unbalanced as to convey the impression that the media are pursuing a political agenda”.
“Since the local mainstream media is either government owned or tightly controlled, this translates into the impression that the government itself has an interest in its outcome.
“Many Malaysians believe that sections of the executive and political establishment have an interest in this trial. There does not seem to have been any attempt to remove this suspicion,” Razaleigh said.
“In such circumstances the principle that justice must not only be done but seen to be done is breached,” the former trade minister added.
He also cited that as in the case of the constitutional crisis in Perak and in the openly illegal denial of oil royalty payments to Terengganu and now to Kelantan, “we as Malaysians suffer when our Government loses credibility domestically and internationally”.
No comments:
Post a Comment