Coroner's death fall "an accident" verdict flies against core evidence and logic

From page 1 of The Sun:>>>> Coroner: Customs officer fell while trying to escape MACC building via a window

But is Desi surprised by the Malaysian court officer's conclusion?

YES< your guess is a foregone conclusion if you know me well --It's a vehement NO! NO! NO! just so that these Malaysian court officers such as Auizatul Akma Maharani who declared the verdict yesterday in Kuala Lumpur hear Desi loud and clear!

I am angry, no, it's enraged, that the coroner also found that Selangor customs assistant director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed's death last April at an office at the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) was "misadventure", as reported by theSun.

WHY DID I LEAD MY POST STRESSING THAT THE VERDICT FLIES AGAINST KEY EVIDENCE AND LOGIC?

Okay, firstly, the good coroner also stated that he greed with Hospital Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia pathologist Prof Dr Shahrom Abd Wahid that Sarbani fell from the ledge when he climbed out of the window of the third floor pantry.

Was the good doctor a witness to Sarbani's act of climbing out of the window? The most one could claim to infer was Dr Shahrom was "surmising' that that was what could have happened.

Secondly, so based on a third party's guess, no doubt a medical doctor, how could the Coroner "agree" with someone's guess at best?

Thirdly, the good coroner also said he believed that Ahmad Sarbani had climbed out the window to escape via the roof of the badminton court which looked near due to an optical illusion. (The emphasis, in bold highlight, is mine ~~ Desi)

The good coroner was able to mind read what Ahmad Sarbani was judging the distance he had to clear to make a "safe" jump? Any evidence presented in court? At best it was the good coroner making a guess -- mind reading, Mr Coroner, your specialisation?

Lastly, we had heard evidence which stated that Sarbani went to the MACC voluntarily/of his own accord to "amend" an earlier statement he had given to the MACC.

IF INDEED SARBANI WENT ON HIS ON FREE WILL AND INITIATIVE TO THE MACC BUILDING. WHY THE NEED TO "ESCAPE"? He could have just walked up "voluntarily"! My rebuttal is logical against the corner's opinions via the last two paragraphs in the Sun's report which again showed him using his mind-reading prowess, viz:

"I am of the view he may have known he would be stopped by any MACC officers if he tried to leaving by by taking the lift down, and the only was for him to escape was through the poantry window," said Aizatul.

"I believe Sarbani came out of the window to avoid being detained in what he thought of hell on earth but had by an optical illusion believed he could land on the roof (next to the badminton court) but fell," he said.



Now something positive from the coroner, at least a saving grace IMHO, shing through from the whole biased judgement always finding in favour of the MACC/prosecution case:- "It is not questioned that Sarbani was a customs officer who had a good character and was respected by his colleagues. He was also a good husband and a good father in his family," said Aizatul, according to theSun's frontpage report.

At least this finding vindicates against lots of rumours and claims, especially by MACC-biased parties in my humble opinion, that Sarbani could have committed suicide. For once the good Coroner's conclusion would not support any such dastardly theory well spread in the initial investigation into ANOTHER undeserved tragic Malaysian's death at an MACC premises. Why the "ANOTHER" stress, you dare ask? Have you such short memories -- remember Teoh Beng Hock?