My Anthem

Monday, November 10, 2014

China in driver's seat to promote THE ASIA-PACIFIC ERA of DREAMS


Xi offers vision of China-driven 'Asia-Pacific dream'

AFP
China's President Xi Jinping speaks on November 9, 2014, at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit in Beijing
.
View gallery
Beijing (AFP) - President Xi Jinping offered the world a vision of a Chinese-driven "Asia-Pacific dream" on Sunday, as Beijing hosts a regional gathering that underlines its growing global clout.
"We have the responsibility to create and realise an Asia-Pacific dream for the people of the region," the Chinese Communist chief told a gathering of business and political leaders that precedes the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' gathering.
The 21-member APEC groups 40 percent of the world's population, almost half its trade and more than half its GDP, and the summit will be attended by leaders including US President Barack Obama, his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
It will see Beijing push its preferred Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP), while Washington is driving its own Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
The TPP is seen as the economic element of the much-touted US "rebalance" to Asia and so far brings together 12 APEC nations including Japan and Australia -- but not China.
Obama left Washington Sunday, with the White House saying he was expected to have "candid and in-depth conversations" with Xi, after Secretary of State John Kerry last week described the two powers' relationship as the "most consequential" in the world.
"For the Asia-Pacific and the world at large, China's development will generate huge opportunities and benefits and hold lasting and infinite promise," Xi said.
He later welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom he has a shared outlook on issues such as trade, investment and geopolitical interests, including a wariness of the United States.
It was "time to gather fruit" from "the tree of Russian-Chinese relations", Xi told Putin, as the two sides signed agreements stepping up their multi-billion-dollar energy and resources cooperation.
- Chinese dream -
Xi told the business meeting his "Asia-Pacific dream" was based on a "shared destiny" of peace, development and mutual benefit in the region.
The comments have echoes of the "Chinese dream" he regularly speaks of, an unspecified but much-discussed term with connotations of national resurgence.
Beijing -- a veto-wielding permanent member of the UN Security Council -- is leveraging the decades-long boom that has made it the world's second-largest economy to increase its regional and global heft.
But it stresses a policy of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs -- a stance that has enabled it to do business with leaders seen as pariahs in the West.
Its relationship with the United States has been marred by tensions over trade disputes, cyberspying and human rights issues, while Beijing is embroiled in enduring disputes with Tokyo over islands in the East China Sea, and with rival claimants in the South China Sea.
Under Xi, it has been asserting those claims more firmly.
"China wants to live in harmony with all its neighbours," he said Sunday.
Nonetheless, relations with Japan have plunged in recent years with both sides sending ships and aircraft to the islands, which are controlled by Tokyo and claimed by Beijing, raising fears of clashes.
Hopes of an ice-breaking formal meeting between Xi and Abe on the sidelines of the summit have risen following statements by the two countries agreeing to try to improve ties.
But Japanese officials say the key sentence in their statement was "very carefully written" to avoid Tokyo formally acknowledging that there was a dispute on sovereignty over the islands.
"We did not give in to the Chinese demand," one official said.
- 'Not that scary' -
China's decades-long economic boom has seen it overtake Japan as the world's second-largest economy. But its growth reached a five-year low in the third quarter.
Xi said the risks it faced were "not that scary" and slower expansion was expected as its economy matures.
China currently suffers from a deflating property bubble, a crackdown on corruption blamed for curbing some business, and weak demand from Europe.
Even so it was expected to invest more than $1.25 trillion abroad over the next decade, Xi said, while outbound Chinese tourists would exceed 500 million over the next five years.
As "China's overall national strength grows", he told his audience, it would be able and willing to offer "new initiatives and visions for enhancing regional cooperation".
A draft summit communique seen by AFP calls for a "strategic study" on the Beijing-backed FTAAP. But Michael Froman, the US Trade Representative, told reporters Sunday: "It’s not the launch of a new organisation, it's not the launch of a new FTA."
FTAAP, he said, was a "long-term aspiration" to be achieved only through other existing negotiations such as TPP, which was "clearly" the priority for the world's biggest economy.
The communique refers to "the eventual realisation" of the FTAAP.
But whether the leaders will endorse the so-called "Beijing Roadmap" towards the FTAAP remained unclear.

DESIDERATA: AND TO THOSE NINCOMPOOPS IN BOLEHLAND STILL WITH BLINKERERED EYES WANTING TO CLOSAE DOWN VERNACULAR SCHOOLS, think again!  wE WANT mALAYSIAN YOUTHS TO GLOBALISE THEMSELVES, SO THE more languages they learn, THE BETTER EQUIPPED THEY ARE TO COMPETE IN THE INTERNATIONAL ARENA! mE, i WISH I WAS y&a AGAIN! YL, dESI, knottyaSSUSUAL

Will the Law be another Ass This Time?

My goOdfriend KimQ has some optimism in forthcoming Verdict facing DS Anwar Ibrahim, potentiual PM of Malaysia:)~~~~

kim quek

Anwar’s final appeal: will Federal Court shine?
By Kim Quek
09.11.2014
The historical 8-day hearing of the final appeal of Anwar Ibrahim at the Federal Court against his sodomy conviction has unexpectedly brightened the prospect of an acquittal.
In contrast with the Court of Appeal which rushed through the entire process of hearing, deliberation, judgment and sentencing (of the 5-year jail term), all in two days, apparently to fulfil a political target, the current court allowed full opportunity to both prosecution and defence to air all their arguments, stretching the hearing to a record 8 days.
During these lengthy submissions, an even clearer picture has emerged that this is decidedly a case heavily tilted in favour of the defence.
This is a case of one man’s words against another’s, with no eyewitnesses. So, corroborative evidence becomes vital.
And the only important corroborative evidence of the prosecution is the DNA evidence.
DNA EVIDENCE THOROUGHLY FLAWED
The defence had already strongly established that such DNA evidence was flawed at the High Court and, again, at the Court of Appeal. And now, it had further strengthened its case by highlighting and emphasising the main flaws.
Central to the DNA issue is the irrefutable evidence of sample tampering,  compounded by the highly implausible finding of pristine samples and the unexplained presence of third party DNA.
Investigating officer Jude Pereira had broken the only tamper-proof seal without justification, and he further kept the DNA samples for 42 hours in his steel cabinet against regulations, thus fatally damaging the integrity of the chain of custody of these samples, as well as exposing them to inevitable contamination.
Despite a lapse of 56 hours before the samples were extracted from complainant Saiful Bukhari Azlan’s rectum and another 42 hours in non-freezing condition before reaching the chemist, the latter’s DNA analysis report miraculously indicated no  degradation in the samples. Such highly implausible phenomenon strongly indicates that the samples analysed by the chemist were not the same as those retrieved from Saiful.
Further, there was the presence of third party DNA in the samples, which the government chemists had hidden in their reports, but was uncovered by defence’s expert witness. The prosecution has given no credible explanation to the presence of such third party DNA.
Worsening the crisis of confidence in the integrity of these DNA findings is defence’s latest revelation that Pereira had in fact been found to be an unreliable witness by none other than lead prosecutor Shafee Abdullah himself in an earlier human rights hearing conducted by Suhakam and chaired by Shafee.
To these damaging submissions by the defence, the prosecution has given no credible rebuttal.
So, what we have is an unreliable investigation officer who had tampered with the samples before delivering the same to the chemist, which samples were later found to be in conditions that were totally incompatible with their history.
Can such a doubt-ridden DNA test report be relied upon as the principal corroborative evidence to convict an accused in any court of law where there is no direct evidence?
The answer is an emphatic no.
COMPLAINANT’S CREDIBILITY IMPAIRED
In an attempt to lend credibility to the story of sodomy, lead prosecutor Shafee went at length to suggest a long-standing intimate relationship between Saiful and Anwar, claiming the latter had given the former a very expensive Brioni suit and generous allowances. But significantly, the scenario constructed by Shafee was completely inferred from the words uttered by Saiful in his narration of the alleged incident – there was no supporting evidence other than Saiful’s words.
The question is: are Saiful’s words good enough for conviction?
Despite Shafee’s claim of Saiful being a completely truthful witness, evidences highlighted by the defence indicate otherwise.
Saiful claimed that he was given the Brioni suit by Anwar, but the suit produced in court showed no label.  Is it credible that the very high-end Brioni product carries no label?
Saiful said he was sodomised in condo unit 1-11-5, on a carpet.  But the police had seized the carpet from unit 2-11-5; there was no carpet in unit 1-2-11-5, and there is no connecting door between the two units.
Saiful said that in the alleged sodomy act, he applied K-Y jelly, which had spilled over the carpet.  But police investigation had found neither evidence of jelly nor any other forensic evidence on the carpet.
Saiful said he had always idolised Anwar, but evidence indicated that he was in fact pro-Barisan Nasional and anti-Anwar from his posting in the Friendster account, and his pal Najwan Haliman had testified that Saiful was not to be trusted.
Saiful attributed his long delay to seek medical examination and make police report to his fear for his safety, but such claim flies in the face of the fact that two days before the alleged incident, he met with then Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak at his residence, had a secret meeting with senior police officer Rodwan Yusof who featured prominently in the fabrication of DNA evidence against Anwar in his 1999 sodomy trial, and had a telephone conversation with then Inspector General of Police Musa Hassan. 
Did such high-level liaison tally up with Saiful’s claim of being a timid victim of sodomy, frightened to make a report to the authorities? Wasm’t it obvious that there was much more to Saiful’s long delay to make a report than his claim of fear?
Shafee’s portrayal of Saiful as an innocent and helpless victim also could not be borne out by the latter’s affair with a female member of the prosecution team Farah Azlina Latif during the trial, from whom Saiful had presumably extracted unauthorised information. Farah was later removed from the team due to this scandal, but neither the High Court nor the Court of Appeal had taken note of the negative impact the defence had submitted over this incident.
With so many yawning gaps between evidence and fact in Saiful’s testimony and in prosecutor’s characterisation of him, it is clear that Saiful is no innocent victim as made out to be, and that his words certainly cannot be accepted as truthful evidence without corroboration.  And lead prosecutor Shafee’s construction of a weak employee sexually harassed by an oppressive employer, based completely on Saiful’s words, is certainly unacceptable.
WILL FEDERAL COURT DELIVER JUSTICE?
Then how can any court convict the accused based on the words of an unreliable complainant, whose only corroborative evidence (the sodomy tests) has proven to be thoroughly flawed?
Indeed, this trial should not even have started, when all the four doctors (in two hospitals) have unanimously found no physical evidence of penetration.  It is a marvel in modern times that such a farcical trial has stretched for six long years, much to the pain of Anwar, his family, and the nation.
Looking back at the many unjust twists and turns that Anwar has suffered in the past six years, the Malaysian law-enforcement authorities and the judiciary have certainly done injustice to Anwar.
At this finality of the trial, without high expectations, the public was hence pleasantly surprised and heartened when the current court showed meticulous attention to details submitted by both sides and allowed full laxity of time for presentation of facts and law, which is in complete contrast to the earlier hearing by the Court of Appeal which had rushed to a verdict in unreasonable time apparently to meet a political dateline.
The public now has high expectations that the panel of five judges headed by Chief Justice Arifin Zakaria, and comprising Justices Raus Sharif, Hamid Embong, Suriyadi Halim Omar and Ramly Ali will give full consideration to the submissions from both protagonists and make their judgments conscientiously in accordance with law, without fear or favour, and free of political influence.

Kim Quek







 

When the LAW is an ASS, overseas and in Malaysia Boleh2!

Chef, 90, faces jail, fines for feeding the homeless

By Zachary Fagenson
MIAMI (Reuters) - For decades,  has hauled pans filled with roast chicken and cheese-covered potatoes onto a south Florida beach park to feed hundreds of homeless people.
For his good deeds, Abbott finds himself facing up to two months in jail and hundreds of dollars in fines after new laws that restrict public feeding of the homeless went into effect in Fort Lauderdale earlier this year.
“I’ve been fighting for the underdog all my life, so this is nothing new,” Abbott said.
He was first cited last Sunday, along with two clergymen and a volunteer from his nonprofit, Love Thy Neighbor.
On Wednesday, several police cars waited for Abbott at a downtown Fort Lauderdale park, and officers pulled aside the frail man, clad in a white chef’s coat, soon after the first plates were ready to be served.
“The ordinance does not prohibit feeding the homeless; it regulates the activity in order to ensure it is carried out in an appropriate, organized, clean and healthy manner,” Fort Lauderdale Mayor John P. Seiler said in a statement.
Abbott moved to Florida from Massachusetts in 1970 and was a civil rights activist and wholesale jewelry salesman. He and his wife first began feeding the homeless on their own in 1979. He started the foundation and feeding full time in 1991 after his wife died, in a tribute to her memory.
The dispute highlights a debate between two schools of homeless rights activists: Those who argue that banning public feeding criminalizes the homeless, and others who say feeding and panhandling helps keep them on the street.
Since January 2013, 21 cities across the country have passed laws restricting public feedings and 10 more have similar rules under consideration, according to an October report from the National Coalition to the Homeless. Nationwide, at least 57 cities have limited or banned public feeding.
"One of the reasons these kinds of ordinances are being embraced is that this is what cities can do without spending money,” said Jerry Jones, the coalition’s executive director.
A widely agreed-upon solution - giving the longtime homeless beds as they work their way into treatment programs - is too costly for many municipalities that struggle with homelessness.
But advocates for the homeless say that ignores the costs of not addressing the issue in a compassionate way.
“What’s the cost if somebody presents themselves five times annually to an emergency room?” asked Ron Book, a high-profile Florida lobbyist who chairs Miami-Dade County’s Homeless Trust with a tax-backed, $55 million budget.
(Editing by David Adams; Editing by Bernadette Baum)


Dear ER and fellow Malysians, DON'T EASILY FORGET! Let's prove the long retired but not forgetten PM Dr Mahathir who often admonished the citizens:  "Rakyat Mudah Lupa! "


Updated: Thursday July 3, 2014 MYT 3:56:40 PM

Tengku Adnan: Soup kitchens banned within 2km radius of city centre

Packets of food is distributed for free to the homeless at several locations throughout the city by Pertiwi Soup Kitchen on several nights a week.
Packets of food is distributed for free to the homeless at several locations throughout the city by Pertiwi Soup Kitchen on several nights a week.
KUALA LUMPUR: Soup kitchens will no longer be allowed to operate within a 2km radius of Lot 10, which covers a large portion of the city centre, effective immediately, said Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor.
"This activity just encourages people to remain homeless and jobless. There have been many such people whom we have found jobs for, who returned to that life because they said it is easier," he said at press conference to present official appointment letters to representatives on the Non-Islam House of Worship committee in Menara DBKL here Thursday.
A Google Maps image of the city centre showing the two-kilometre radius around Lot 10.
He added that the sessions also resulted in littering and this in turn attracted scavengers that brought about diseases.
"We already have all kinds of garbage-related problems in the city and spend more than RM90mil a year collecting it. I do not see my actions as harsh but necessary in order to create a disciplined society," he said.
Tengku Adnan added that the soup kitchens have not been officially notified of this and a meeting with them to discuss it will be held soon.
However, he said they would be given the next two days to comply with the decision and action will be taken against those who continue to run the activities.


DESIDERATA: GOoDnews is that the Minister/DBKL were forced by People's Power to GO-STAN -- another train we msut admonish the powers-that-be! -- on the idiotic policies! I have faith that the Miami's citizens will rise up to support gOod old but determined to do good and follow-your-heART 90-year-old Arnold Abbott! Ten salutes Sdr Arnold, a socialist after DEsi' heART!

Saturday, November 08, 2014

another inteARRESTING story from the court come A-courting...

More Testing and Serious wan!:

PKR’s Nik Nazmi has grounds to sue for malicious prosecution, say lawyers

PKR Youth chief Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad's decision to sue the Attorney-General (A-G) for malicious prosecution is well founded as he was charged for an offence that no longer existed in the statute book, lawyers said.
They said the A-G's persistent action against the Selangor executive councillor in the lower courts after the landmark Court of Appeal ruling last April showed bad faith and abuse of court process.
Lawyer Fahri Azzat said the A-G's action against the Seri Setia assemblyman gave the impression that the former was either ignorant of the law or did not know the workings of the legal system.
"You cannot possibly frame a charge against a person for an offence that has been struck out by a superior court," he told The Malaysian Insider.
Fahri said this in response to Nik Nazmi's intention to file a lawsuit after the latter was acquitted – for the fourth time – from a charge of violating the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) 2012.
The High Court in Shah Alam yesterday dismissed the prosecution's appeal against Nik Nazmi's acquittal on grounds that it was bound by the Court of Appeal ruling.
His lawyer N. Surendran said the A-G must be held accountable for his action.
Lawyer Syahredzan Johan, who is preparing the papers for the lawsuit, said the action would be filed within the next 14 days.
"We will keep you informed once we are ready for filing," he added.
The 32-year-old PKR politician was charged on May 17, last year, in the Sessions Court with violating section 9 (1) of the PAA for failure to give 10 days' notice to police ahead of the "Blackout 505" rally on May 8 last year.
The gathering was held at the Kelana Jaya stadium in Petaling Jaya in protest of the  2013 general election results.
Section 9 (5) states that those found guilty can be fined up to RM10,000 and in Nik Nazmi's case he risked being disqualified from public office if convicted.
He failed to get the High Court to quash the charge against him on the grounds that sections 9(1) and 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act were unconstitutional.
However, the Court of Appeal, in a landmark decision, ruled that Parliament could not criminalise Nik Nazmi's action as the organiser of the rally.
In acquitting, him, the appellate court struck down section 9(5) as it violated the right to assemble peacefully as enshrined in the Federal Constitution.
Lawyers for Liberty executive director Eric Paulsen says the Attorney-General's persistent action against Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad shows bad faith. – The Malaysian Insider file pic, November 8, 2014.However, the prosecution filed a fresh charge over the same offence in May this year at the Sessions Court.
The deputy public prosecutor subsequently asked for a postponement as the prosecution had filed an appeal on the matter with the Federal Court.
However, the Sessions Court judge acquitted Nik Nazmi, in following the Court of Appeal ruling. The prosecution then appealed to the High Court.
Yesterday, the High Court judge said that a higher court had already issued an order that could not be revised by the lower court due to binding precedent.
Lawyers for Liberty executive director Eric Paulsen said the A-G’s persistent action against Nik Nazmi showed “bad faith" and that the A-G was "being vindictive".
Paulsen said it would be an uphill task to take on the A-G but this was an appropriate case for malicious prosecution.
Lawyer Mohamed Hanipa Maidin said the A-G's action must be challenged because the Court of Appeal had struck out the punishment provision in the PAA.
He said it was also shocking that the prosecution should be taking the action against Nik Nazmi.
"Malicious prosecution is a recognisable common law civil action and plaintiffs have succeeded against the authorities," he said.
Hanipa, who is also the Sepang MP, said as a guardian of public interest, the A-G should also respect the law and legal process.
"To my mind, Nik Nazmi's matter cannot go to the Federal Court because the PAA case started in the Sessions Court and must end in the Court of Appeal," he said.
Hanipa said the A-G should strive to end the PAA saga and accept the Court of Appeal's decision. – November 8, 2014.

********************************* resumde @14.29PM:) see how heart Desi works for his esteemedreaders!

J'ST DESSERTS: I broke for lunch, so this socialist who couldn't invite you for a capitalist meal, make do wit' the foloowing:)

‘We are exhausted,’ CJ says as prosecution bids for rebuttal

PUTRAJAYA, Nov 7 — An appeal hearing initially scheduled for two days but is now in its eighth day of hearing has left a Federal Court panel “exhausted” and unwilling to entertain a request by the prosecution to revisit matters already heard.
Following the conclusion of defence lawyer Gopal Sri Ram’s submissions today, lead prosecutor Tan Sri Muhd Shafee Abdullah told the court that the prosecution wished to reply to the matters just raised.
But Chief Justice Tun Arifin Zakaria was unreceptive towards the attempt, asking whether the defence had raised any issue that merited the prosecution’s rebuttal.
“We are exhausted,” Arifin told Shafee.
This prompted the private lawyer to wade through a bundle of documents to locate his point of contention, which centred on the state of mind of Anwar’s accuser, Saiful Bukhari Azlan, at the time of the alleged sodomy.
The defence previously asserted that a photograph of him appearing relax at a tea party the day after the alleged sodomy was inconsistent with that of a victim of sexual assault.
Shafee said that he wished to argue “the distinction between submission and consent.”
Arifin was unmoved and later adjourned the hearing to an unspecified date.
“In view of the submissions... we will need some time (to consider),” he said.
The Federal Court is hearing today Anwar’s challenge of the Court of Appeal’s decision to overturn a lower court’s decision to acquit him of the charge.
The case was originally allotted two days of hearing — October 28 and 29 — but has stretched on for eight days now and with no clear end in sight.
The High Court had in 2012 acquitted Anwar of the 2008 charge but the appellate court ruled on March 7 this year that the trial judge had erred when rejecting the DNA evidence produced in the case.
If Anwar fails to reverse his five-year imprisonment sentence and conviction in the Federal Court, he would lose his seat as the law bars anyone fined RM2,000 or imprisoned for one year from serving as a lawmaker.
Today’s hearing is presided over by a five-member panel led by Chief Justice Tun Arifin Zakaria. Others include Court of Appeal president Tan Sri Md Raus Sharif and Federal Court judges Tan Sri Abdul Hamid Embong, Tan Sri Suriyadi Halim Omar and Datuk Ramly Ali.
Anwar is represented by a 14-man defence team led by Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram. Others include lawyers R.Sivarasa, Latheefa Koya, N. Surendran and Gobind Singh Deo.

inteARRESTING story from the court come A-courting...

First a juicy one, which I heard eon years ago when two stock exchyanges came to a STANDSTILL on both sides of the Causeway. In facxt, as a newsdog during that era, Desi learnt that an UMohNO! bigwig was also being sought for similar offences, but you know-lah, sometimes this breed knew how to survive!:~~~~

Tycoon hubby sought Canadian citizenship to avoid arrest, ex-beauty queen claims

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 8 — Billionaire Tan Sri Khoo Kay Peng had asked for a Canadian citizenship in the 1990s to avoid arrest by the Singaporean authorities, which was investigating a company belonging to him in the island state, his wife Pauline Chai told the High Court here today.
Speaking during the couple’s highly publicised domicile trial here, the former Miss Malaysia claimed that Khoo had wanted to apply for permanent residency in Canada because the country had no extradition co-operation with Singapore.
She said the tycoon had then feared for his life after some of his colleagues were arrested by the Singaporean authorities over allegations of mismanagement involving his company, Pan Electric Industries.
“We had first stayed in Australia but when the Pan Electric fiasco (happened), two of his friends got investigated so we moved to Canada because they had no extradition laws there.
“The children all had to be uprooted and we stayed there for 20-odd years,” Chai said.
According to her affidavit that was sighted by Malay Mail Online, Khoo’s lawyers had first advised him and his family to move to Australia, where he, Chai and his children eventually settled down.
But Chai claimed her husband fell into depression, as he was not certain if Australian laws could still prevent him from being extradited to Singapore.
Khoo also felt that moving to Canada would be good for his three children as the education standards there were much better.
“We already knew it well and it doesn’t have an extradition treaty,” the former Miss Malaysia said.
Chai, 68, told the court yesterday the billionaire had made “all” decisions in the family, such as deciding her and their children’s move to Australia in 1980 and subsequently to Canada in 1989 for the children’s education.
She made the same statement today and said she and the children were forced to follow Khoo’s decisions and move as required.
Chai is seeking for the dispute to be decided by the English courts where she stands to gain up to half of Khoo’s estimated £400 million (RM2.1 billion) fortune, possibly the largest divorce settlement in British history.
An English court ruled earlier on October 17 that England was the more appropriate forum for the case to be heard.
Khoo, however, is applying to have the case heard in Malaysia, arguing that they were married in Malaysia where he also maintains his official residence. Khoo would risk losing far less of his wealth if the trial is held here.
Chai argues that UK is her permanent residence and had cited as proof the collection of 1,000 pairs of shoes she kept at their £30 million (RM158 million) Rossway home in Hertfordshire, England, according to British media reports.
Chai is also arguing that their son Alex, who suffers from autism and had been suffering from chronic depression, must stay in the UK as it was the country with the best rehabilitation programme.
The High Court has asked the lawyers from both sides to file in their final submissions by November 19.
Decision is to be delivered on November 28.

Wednesday, November 05, 2014

Mal Minded Logic? Go back to Orifice where the sun don't shine

Someone says Yes, the evidence is obtained "illegally"
But it can still be admissible in court
Is that the logic of legal minds in Malsia?

Yes, my basic knowledge of law is gained
from watching the olde Earl Stanley Gardner's
and the modern Law & Order

But frankly, you don't need rocket science to understand simple Common Sense logic, No?
Maybe Malsian courtroom DPPs use different Law references
And dictionary
From Laymaen like Desi?


That errand boy is so scared of his Master
So he brings K or Y jelly to protect him/herself
Really?
GOoD logic inverted when the brain cells are relocated to thatOrific
Where the sun don't shine

Desi knows 1+1 is two
But some lawyers better traine would not agree
They use a calculator, the outcome says "four"
Who am I to disagree
I have a simple God gifted mind
I jest like to beg to dis- or miss-agree

Mr Prosecutor, why don't you prosecute Desi
For your logic I have eyes
But I-I no see


PS: I'm on a curry diet, the rich Indian spices maeketh mu mind go knotty
So I quickly penned this ditty before THEY come for me
Then you no Amore read funny poems by Desi!